4/30/2011 — HAARP rings = severe in St Louis, Springfield, Omaha, Chicago 24-48 hours


In the towns of Saint Louis Missouri, Springfield illinois, Omaha Nebraska, Lacrosse Wisconsin, and Dixon to Chicago illinois, and Milwaukee… expect severe weather up to and including tornadoes in the next 24-48 hours from now .. 300am CST 4/30/2011 . Based upon the “HAARP VLF UHF” radar rings showing up around each effected area. www.intellicast.com www.theweathernetwork.com weather.unisys.com radar.weather.gov

25 thoughts on “4/30/2011 — HAARP rings = severe in St Louis, Springfield, Omaha, Chicago 24-48 hours

  1. videoproducer100

    Here in Milwaukee I think the only difference in weather was rain almost every day for a week or two in May-June, but that happens. I don’t think we had any effects from these “Haarp Rings”.

    Reply
  2. killawill1223

    I dont think that we know everything about haarp but shortly after Missouri experienced flooding and devastating tornado’s. cause and effect, keep an open mind and critically think about who and why this is happening then ask yourself what should we the people do about it.

    Reply
  3. bluelotus00

    I’ve posted all the science proving weather warfare, and made criticisms of your UNSCIENTIFIC speculations Dutch , based on ridiculous idiocy such as ‘scalar squares’ rather than real production HAARP phenomenonon such as ionospheric lensing and tropospheric aerosols. Please take the quality up a notch so as not to discredit this research.

    This means keeping detailed records of your predictions and accuracy, devising a robust theory-experiment-refinement model, and so forth.

    Reply
  4. bluelotus00

    “Method for Producing a Shell of Relativistic Particles at an Altitude Above the Earths Surface”
    Bernard J. Eastlund inventor, US Patent Number: 5,038,664 Issue Date: 8/13/91,Assignee: APTI, Inc.

    “Method and Apparatus For Altering a Region in the Earth’s Atmosphere, Ionosphere, and/or
    Magnetosphere” Bernard J. Eastlund inventor, US Patent Number: 4,686,605 Issue Date: 8/11/87
    Assignee: APTI, Inc.

    Reply
  5. bluelotus00

    Full Old-school HAARP Radar Anomaly Archive
    h ttp://ti ny u rl.co m/3pdgtua

    And seriously, please STFU about HAARP ’emanating from airports’. You sound incredibly newb. HAARP comes from ionospheric lensing, as detailed in the Eastlund patents — reinterpreted by the military-industrial complex.

    FOR GOD’S SAKE, PLEASE DONT SAY ‘SCALAR SQUARE’ AGAIN, and LOOK UP WHAT THE IONOSPHERE IS.

    Reply
  6. bluelotus00

    That said, rapid NEXRAD mode switching across a region can indicate that HAARP is active, but this does not mean that the signals are eminating from the NEXRAD sites, nor that the target is the NEXRAD site… this is simply an artifact of your mechanism of observation, as there are only 155 data points (NEXRAD sites) for the entire CONUS.

    I suggest you review some *REAL* obvious HAARP anomalies prior to the newer , more robust data scrubbing systems implemented by Unisys.

    Reply
  7. bluelotus00

    Thus — This results in what looks like circular ‘blips’, formed as ring-like blasts which turn on and off at the location of NEXRAD sites. These could be mistaken for HAARP blasts (which have much larger circular radius) , but the big difference are A) NEXRAD mode switching occurs at precisely the NEXRAD sites B) NEXRAD mode switching radius is identical to that of the NEXRAD range. (114km to 471.6km… usually about 193 km)

    Reply
  8. bluelotus00

    4) NEXRAD stations switch from CLEAR AIR to PRECIPITATION mode and back again , causing them to drop in and out of composite/mosaic radar images which have been stitched together from the 155 sites .

    The NEXRAD sites switch mode based on atmospheric reflectivity. In PRECIPITATION mode the scan rate is much higher (and the coloring is different) . Furthermore ,the station mode often determines whether the station’s Base Reflectivity is included in any National and/or Regional Mosaic maps.

    Reply
  9. bluelotus00

    4) NEXRAD stations switch from CLEAR AIR to PRECIPITATION mode and back again , causing them to drop in and out of composite/mosaic radar images which have been stitched together from the 155 sites .

    The NEXRAD sites switch mode based on atmospheric reflectivity. In PRECIPITATION mode the scan rate is much higher (and the coloring is different) . Furthermore ,the station mode often determines whether the station’s Base Reflectivity is included in any National and/or Regional Mosaic maps.

    Reply
  10. bluelotus00

    I swear to God if I hear you talk about ‘Scalar Squares’ as if they are actual energetic phenomenon rather than ARTIFACTS of the scrubbing and data processing I’m going to throw up on my keyboard. Energy is a WAVE FUNCTION (Schrodinger’s wave equation). Do you think it looks like a square? Or are ‘scalar squares’ products of an image processing algorithm? Go look at the f*cking HAARP images here on the GAIACOMM report. Do they look like squares to you?

    h ttp://t inyu r l.co m/3txhbyy

    Reply
  11. bluelotus00

    As I mentioned, most ALL WEATHER IN CONUS is computer-controlled. All the time. It’s a massive enterprise, production level system. As such, there are constantly HAARP-like anomalies that register on these sensitive systems. This NEXRAD data is *Scrubbed* by a central defense contractor (Unisys) prior to being distributed to universities as higher-resolution Level II radar data (Perdue etc), and to the rest of the world as ‘processed’ lower-resolution Level III radar data (Intellicast, etc).

    Reply
  12. bluelotus00

    3) All NEXRAD / TDWR data is *scrubbed* by Unisys to remove evidence of HAARP. Some of what you are seeing (anomalies, ‘scalar squares’, etc) are ARTIFACTS of the Unisys scrubbing process, and some of what you are seeing are ARTIFACTS of the product generation — ‘stiching’ NEXRAD station sites together to make a composite reflectivity image. Please stop claiming everything see you see is ‘scalar energy’ when it could just as easily be artifacts of 1) evidence removal or of 2) data processing.

    Reply
  13. bluelotus00

    You can’t PREDICT a thunderstorm in the next 24-48 hours just because you noticed HAARP anomalies. The anomalies are a constant occurrence — all weather is in CONUS is computer-controlled.

    Reply
  14. bluelotus00

    Unless you are willing to build an actual mathematical models (ie correlation coefficient of anomalous NEXRAD phenomenon with ACTUAL DATA, ie. precipitation level, barometric pressure, lightning intensity, reflectivity integrals, whatever) you are just shooting in the dark.

    Reply
  15. bluelotus00

    If you want to make weather predictions : You need to measure tangible quantities of HAARP-type anomalies, OBJECTIVELY, and correlate these with measurable weather phenomenon. For example, you’d need to computationally measure the amount of a particular class of scalar anomalies per 24 hour period. With an actual data model.

    Reply
  16. bluelotus00

    But you gotta hold back on these ‘shot in the dark’ predictions on phenomenon you do not yet understand. Without articulating consistent reasoning , you just discredit yourself.

    If you had been watching these radar anomalies for YEARS , you’d realize that our weather is pretty much HAARP controlled all the time. It’s not an indication of anything special or unique to find scalar energy signatures in radar or satellite data. These signatures are ubiquitous now.

    Reply
  17. bluelotus00

    But to say that you are predicting ‘severe weather’ on the basis of a single-digit number of HAARP anomalies observed on scrubbed LevelII radar from Unisys? Come on man. This is really a stretch. Please stop issuing these forecasts … I watch your channel regularly, but these really make me cringe at how amateur they sound. You sound like you’ve just discovered that the weather is computer-controlled , and it’s a whole new world to you. That’s fine. Yeah it’s astonishing, I felt the same way.

    Reply
  18. bluelotus00

    2) Please stop claiming to make future predictions of ‘severe weather’ based on your perception of HAARP anomalies. This is unscientific and is NOT predictive.

    It makes for good Youtube, but it’s not accurate. Humans are notoriously bad at prediction. ‘Human-based’ prediction only makes sense on things like interpolation of complex unrelated data (HAARP anomalies + NLE 2011 + New Madrid Flooding + Emergency Contracts == Possible New Madrid Earthquake 2011). So sure, we can do that.

    Reply
  19. bluelotus00

    h ttp://ti ny url.c o m/3jxtqgy

    Does that anomaly look ground-based to you? Most certainly not. It’s either (A) coming from space , (B) bounced off the ionosphere from a high-energy ground system in another location.

    You see anomalies centered on NEXRAD stations because that’s where you are looking. In other words , you have 155 stations that consistently show anomalies. It does not mean these stations are the source of the HAARP energy. They are just a symptom — a manifestation of evidence.

    Reply
  20. bluelotus00

    The NEXRAD station anomalies are just a symptom.

    You can not consistently extrapolate the ultimate ‘source’ of HAARP energy with only crappy 2dimensionsal Unisys-processed NEXRAD Level III Radar Information. Once or twice you may get lucky, but this method is going with be inconsistent unless you actually understand exactly how the full weather-control working, to include the trigonometry, frequency, spectrum, bandwidth, etc.

    Reply
  21. bluelotus00

    Does having HAARP signals based at NEXRAD stations really make sense from a national security or military perspective? Not at all. Common sense man. Do you think these people really care about laws ? Airport signal restrictions have *nothing* to do with it, I assure you. These people do whatever they want.

    The HAARP signals are most likely REMOTE , SECURE RF Ground-antenna arrays bouncing energy off the ionosphere. Look up the Bernard Eastlund patents and Tesla’s Colorado Springs Experiments.

    Reply
  22. bluelotus00

    Just because you see anomalies centered on NEXRAD stations doesn’t mean the anomalies ORIGINATE from those stations.* (or at ‘airports’ etc).

    Come on , *think* , man. If you had trillions in funding, and were building a system like this, would you really set up shop with your ground-based systems at civilian airports (the same place you use for weather radar)? Or would you start building remote bases on military sites in the middle of nowhere with massive antenna arrays to RF the ionosphere?

    Reply
  23. bluelotus00

    1) HAARP is not necessarily based at NEXRAD stations.

    This is the claim that you are postulating that gets under my skin the most.

    Please stop claiming NEXRAD sites are the source of HAARP ; it just makes you look like an amateur to any aware scientist. You are confusing cause and effect. You’ve provided no evidence to back this claim up (that HAARP signals primarily originate at NEXRAD sites).

    If I look for girls with red hair, I’ll see them everywhere. It’s call confirmation bias.

    Reply
  24. bluelotus00

    You are doing damage to people’s knowledge collective knowledge here , regarding this massive black project , by taking every single one of your assumptions and passing them off as fact (without careful, measured study).

    So consider the following criticisms:

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*