CRAZY HUGE CHEMTRAIL SPOTTED OVER LAS VEGAS


MORE: http://thecount.com I can not say what that stuff was but I can say it was one of the biggest chemtrails I have seen. Music is by thecount.

24 thoughts on “CRAZY HUGE CHEMTRAIL SPOTTED OVER LAS VEGAS

  1. Thomas Parsons

    I am suggesting the that level of collusion would run into the tens of thousands of people. Think about the effort to keep just one jet aircraft airborne in terms of all the people who have to be involved.? For the front end crew, load masters, maintenance, PDM (this alone is hundreds for just on aircraft), ACT, fueling just to name a few but the list is long. All these people breath the same air.

    Reply
  2. Thomas Parsons

    It would take imagination. Aircraft manufactures, the FAA, aircraft hobbyist and others diligently tract the tail numbers of almost every type of aircraft. For instance there are websites that list the tail numbers of every KC135, C141 or C130 ever produced and the disposition of those? aircraft presently. I met a man once who’s hobby was corporate jets. He new exactly who owned literally hundreds of aircraft. There are those that follow many other aircraft like KC135s, KC10s. It is not possible

    Reply
  3. Thomas Parsons

    Contrails last for hours and this has been photographed, filmed and documented for over 60 years. It is a well know fact and a well? know myth that they do not. The issue about -40 was that a poster stated suggested that this was not possible at those altitudes…it is.

    Reply
  4. doodlesaurous

    What are you suggesting is there would not be enough man power for this operation ? not enough planes ? not enough? pilots ?

    Reply
  5. doodlesaurous

    Ok lol i missed the extraterrestrial weapons thats just cover for black op aircrafts.. I told you i can’t possibly know that? only they could, i do know Evergreen are behind part of the spraying. I also know i didnt see chemtrails 14 years ago now I see hundreds of them and also see clouds form after the have been sprayed. I should imagine they could use the hundreds of decommisioned military aircraft from the military. theres enough of them by far.

    Reply
  6. Thomas Parsons

    What it says is that “space” is above 60km. It is very clear and this means that it does not deal with anything below 60km: “(1) The term `space’ means all space extending UPWARD from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space”………. The whole thing is about space only. If you can’t understand that how can you be sure what is in a contrail 30k feet over your head? ?

    Reply
  7. doodlesaurous

    What have they now ? i don’t recall seeing them at my airport 10 mile down the road from me till 14 years ago and increasing dramactically in the last 2 years. So what if you worked at an? AIR BASE, does that mean ex military all the more reason to bullshit about it.. I seen no facts just your opinion.

    Reply
  8. Thomas Parsons

    extraterrestrial weapons? really? You really do not know a thing about aviation do you? I asked once before, How many aircraft are involved? Hundreds, thousands? Who manufactures these aircraft?? Where? Where are they based at? How many crew does it take to fly them, maintain them? Thousands? Tens of thousands? Hundreds of thousands?

    Reply
  9. Thomas Parsons

    Persistent contrails have been seen, photographed and filmed for well over 60 years. metabunk -dot- org/threads/pre-1995-persistent-contrail-archive.487/ Aluminium is one of the most abundant substances on Earth. So what I have lived on air bases, off the end of runways and worked as a firefighter? at a very large airport for 20 years. I have been in and around aviation most of my life. But I am not interested in pedigrees only facts like the one I just stated.

    Reply
  10. doodlesaurous

    And you shouldn’t have so much faith in corrupt murdering government who are controled by multinational corporations who control who gets grants for research and the media, which is why the pentagon today had to grovel and promise to tell the truth more, because they are compulsive liars, Everything in that bill listed as a weapon system is real, Eyes wide shut you live in a fascist? Nation. Stockholm syndrome springs to mind.

    Reply
  11. doodlesaurous

    So you through aliens in then say why should we trust these wacos,? the point is this this. Britain has previous (The Ministry of Defence turned large parts of the country into a giant laboratory to conduct a series of secret germ warfare tests on the public.
    A government report just released provides for the first time a comprehensive official history of Britain’s biological weapons trials between 1940 and 1979.) so has the usa.. so you expect me to trust them wacos.

    Reply
  12. Thomas Parsons

    It is even worse. A chemtrailer did not ask for chemtrail to be in the bill they? wrote the bill. Congressman Dennis Kuchinich nor anyone else in government wrote HR2297. it was written by UFO enthusiasts Alfred Webre and Carol Rosin who were trying to: Nullify a vast conspiracy by the “military-industrial? complex”, Allow the use of suppressed alien technology for free energy, Avoid accidentally shooting down or scaring away visiting aliens. How does the writing of these to wacos prove anything?

    Reply
  13. Thomas Parsons

    You should have researched HR2297 a bit. It died in committee because it? was a farce. It took all of 2 mins to locate the history on it.

    Reply
  14. Thomas Parsons

    It is even worse. A chemtrailer did not ask for chemtrail to be in? the bill they wrote the bill. Congressman Dennis Kuchinich nor anyone else in government wrote HR2297. it was written by UFO enthusiasts Alfred Webre and Carol Rosin who were trying to: Nullify a vast conspiracy by the “military-industrial complex”, Allow the use of suppressed alien technology for free energy, Avoid accidentally shooting down or scaring away visiting aliens. How does the writing of these to wacos prove anything?

    Reply
  15. doodlesaurous

    My proof is my eyes I have lived next to a major airport all my life and these CHEMTRAILS have only appeared in the last 14 years in my area. now are you suggesting the entire atmosphere has changed in the last 14 years ? where’s your proof of that? how many planes you say ? again we are not privy to that type of information. Also people have studied the levels of aliminium in the rainfall and it way of the charts but is suppose you think that is fairy? dust !

    Reply
  16. doodlesaurous

    (C) The term `exotic weapons systems’ includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.

    Now your claim some chemtrailer probably begged a congressman to put it in wheres your proof of that claim? ? asshole.

    Reply
  17. doodlesaurous

    (B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as–
    (i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;
    (ii) chemtrails;
    (iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;
    (iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;
    (v) laser weapons systems;
    (vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and
    (vii) chemical,? biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.

    Reply
  18. doodlesaurous

    (II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual? persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or
    (III) by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.

    Reply
  19. doodlesaurous

    (IV) any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means.
    (ii) Inflicting death or injury on,? or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)–
    (I) through the use of any of the means described in clause (i) or subparagraph (B);

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*