FiNAL PROOF Chemtrails NANO Morgellons Dangerous Weather Control Plan


svt.se dataasylum.com stopsprayingcalifornia.com naiwmc.org Amazing video to show how they wanted to use Weather Control as an excuse to pollute with Chemtrails Morgellons.. THiS WAR MUST BE STOPPED NOW!!!!!!!!!!!! FANTASTiC 100% PROOFS from TV!!!! aircrap.org thetruthdenied.com freedomfchs.com wethepeoplewillnotbechipped.com spychips.com theflucase.com 1 google.com 2 google.com 3 google.com 4 google.com STOP NANO/ NATO/ NWO/ UN!!!!!!!!!!!! MEMS – Micro Electro Mechanical Sensors GEMS – Global Environmental MEMS Sensors ? whitetimehealing.net ?

25 thoughts on “FiNAL PROOF Chemtrails NANO Morgellons Dangerous Weather Control Plan

  1. thallium200

    OMG YOU FOUND FINAL PROOF! FINALLY THANK GOD! THE FINAL PROOF ALL OF US HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR! THE PROOF BEYOND PROOF KNOWN AS FINAL PROOF! THIS CLINCHES IT FOR ME, I AM A BELIEVER NOW! THANK YOU SO MUCH! THERE WAS SO MUCH PROOF IN THIS VIDEO IT IS UN DENIABLE! MY GOD THEY ADMITTED EVERYTHING! HOLY CRAP THE PROOF OF ALL PROOF! MORE PROOF THAN THE OTHER PROOF VIDEOS!? THOSE HAD ONLY “PROOF” BUT THIS HAS “FINAL PROOF”

    Reply
  2. batonpatriot

    “Truth is obvious for those able to see”. ? I appears you dont want PROOF, for if you did, you would have found it long before now! Go back to sleep my friend, ignorance is bliss.

    Reply
  3. orasell1

    To be fair, there are many employed / involved in this vast operation with many compartments. I can understand why you’re not convinced.?

    Reply
  4. troutcannon

    FINAL proof? You can’t have final proof. My cat said he has final proof. And seriously…if this spraying were as indiscriminate as all you nutjobs? seem to think, wouldn’t the “new world order” or whoever come down with the same ailments? I bet they have a cure. They always have a cure.

    Reply
  5. countessarcadius

    people with morgellons have NANO-TOXICITY! there is a clinical investigaiton on BDD, BOVINE DIGITAL DERMITITIS, AND MORGELLONS, THEY ARE NOTICING SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE ANIMALS HAVING THIS, AND PEOPLE WITH MORGELLONS, I HAVE THE LINK IF ANYONE WANTS IT, ?

    Reply
  6. countessarcadius

    October 2011 analysis of this product in 13 countries found formaldehyde-releasing chemicals have been replaced in some parts of the world, but not in the U.S. or Canada, among others.Johnson’s Baby Shampoo was pulled from store shelves in China, Taiwan and Vietnam, and several governments responded.but NOT CANADA AND THE US? WHY THE HELL NOT? I THOUGHT THEY CARED SO MUCH ABOUT OUR HEALTH? THIS IS THE SAME FDA THAT SAYS VACCINES, AND OTHER DRUGS THAT ARE DEADLY ARE SAFE FOR US? YA? RIGHT

    Reply
  7. countessarcadius

    in March 2009 found two chemicals linked to cancer, 1,4-dioxane and formaldehyde, in dozens of bath? products for babies and kids, including Sesame Street character brands and even the iconic “pure and gentle” Johnson’s Baby Shampoo. None of the products tested listed 1,4-dioxane or formaldehyde on the label

    Reply
  8. countessarcadius

    Formaldehyde and 1,4-dioxane: found in many leading shampoos and body washes
    Known animal carcinogens and probable human carcinogens, according to US EPA (vii).
    Formaldehyde is a leading allergen that can trigger skin rashes and other allergic? reactions.
    1,4-dioxane is a leading groundwater contaminant and suspected as a kidney toxicant, neurotoxicant and respiratory toxicant, THIS IS IN JOHNSON AND JOHNSON;S BABY SHAMPOO! AND IT DOESN;T HAVE TO BE, JOHNSONS; CLAIMS IT;S SAFE FOR NEWBORNS!

    Reply
  9. countessarcadius

    Triclosan: found in antibacterial soaps and deodorants such as Old Spice Wide Stick Deodorant, Speed Stick deodorants, Dial anti-bacterial soaps and? Edge Advanced Shaving Gel, Ultra Sensitive

    Linked to hormone disruption, and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (iv).
    The Canadian Medical Association asked the Canadian government to ban triclosan in household products due to concerns about bacterial resistance and carcinogenic byproducts (v).

    Reply
  10. countessarcadius

    A study by Harvard University researchers suggests that a single use of cologne can markedly increase the level of DEP in a person’s body (ii).
    Recent product tests found DEP in popular men’s colognes Quicksilver, Calvin Klein Eternity for Men,? Old Spice After Hours Body Spray and Abercrombie & Fitch Fierce (iii).

    Reply
  11. countessarcadius

    Diethyl phthalate (DEP): found? in fragrance-containing products such as cologne, aftershave, shaving cream, shampoos and deodorants Recent human studies link DEP to sperm damage in adult men, abnormal reproductive development in infants, and Attention Deficit Disorder in children (i).

    Reply
  12. countessarcadius

    Lead is a proven neurotoxin that can cause learning, language and behavioral problems such as lowered IQ, reduced school performance and increased aggression. Pregnant women and young children are particularly vulnerable to lead exposure, because lead easily crosses the placenta and enters the fetal brain where it can? interfere with normal development,” according to Sean Palfrey, MD, a professor of pediatrics and public health at Boston University

    Reply
  13. countessarcadius

    Lead builds up in the body over time and lead-containing lipstick applied several times a day, every day, can add up to significant exposure levels. The latest studies show there? is no safe level of lead exposure,” according to Mark Mitchell, MD, MPH, policy advisor of the Connecticut Coalition for Environmental Justice and co-chair of the Environmental Health Task Force for the National Medical Association.

    Reply
  14. countessarcadius

    An expanded FDA study has found lead in hundreds of lipsticks at levels up to 7.19 ppm. Five of the 10 most lead-contaminated brands in the? FDA study are made by L’Oreal USA. how many girls KISS OTHER PEOPLE WITH LIPSTICK ON? LOTS, THESE ARE ALL BRAND NAME PRODUCTS HERE, AND THIS IS JUST LIPSTICK! THE INFORMATION I CAN PROVIDE WOULD ABSOLUTELY BAFFLE PEOPLE , ON how is this happening? BILLIONS OF DOLLARS ANNUALLY ON PERSONAL PRODUCTS, NOW FOR SHAMPOO!

    Reply
  15. countessarcadius

    in 2009 the FDA released a follow-up study that found lead in all samples of lipstick it tested, at levels ranging from 0.09? to 3.06 ppm levels four times higher than the levels found in the Campaign study. FDA found the highest lead levels in lipsticks made by three manufacturers: Procter & Gamble (Cover Girl brand),L’Oreal (L’Oreal, Body Shop and Maybelline brands) and Revlon. Yet FDA has thus far failed to take action to protect consumers. HOW MANY TIMES DOES A GIRL PUT ON LIPSTICK IN A DAY

    Reply
  16. countessarcadius

    LISTEN UP, THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF PRODUCTS OUT THERE THAT ARE DANGEROUS FOR US, PERSONAL PRODUCTS, PEOPLE USE ON A DAILY BASIS, AND NOT JUST ONE PRODUCT, THERE ARE ALSO MANY SAFE PRODUCTS, I HAVE A SITE WHERE THEY SHOW US GOOD, AND BAD, ON A RATING SCALE OF 1-10, even in BABY? SHAMPOO! 61 percent of lipsticks contained lead, with levels ranging up to 0.65 parts per million. Lead-contaminated brands included L’Oreal, Cover Girl and even a $24 tube of Dior Addict.

    Reply
  17. countessarcadius

    This is seriously tiny stuff:a human hair is about 80,000 nanometers in diameter. nano-sized titanium dioxide, often used in sunscreens,may have completely different UV-blocking properties and health effects than conventional titanium dioxide particles (also used in sunscreens).Avoid personal care products that advertise use of? nanotechnology or nano ingredients. Because no labeling laws exist for nanotechnology in any type of consumer product anywhere in the world,TOP SCIENTISTS WARN ABOUT NANO

    Reply
  18. ella5024

    It’s just more nanotech.? Morgellons is a surveillance tool for humans. It’s no accident. It was intended to be used for surveillance.

    Reply
  19. countessarcadius

    lol, LAUGHABLE AT BEST, hope you;re? having fun trollin though,WOULDN;T YOU LIKE TO GET A JOB, WOULDN;T YOU LIKE TO MOVE OUT OF MOMMIES BASEMENT, IT;S NOT FAULT YOU HAVE NO HAIR, OR ARE UNEMPLOYED, BUT HEY, YOU PUT A GOOD ARGUEMENT, LOL LOLL LOL LOL LOL LOL OL

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*